WILLIE SLADE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of WILLIE SLADE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (WILLIE SLADE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
WILLIE SLADE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D17-957
[August 2, 2017]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 312009CF001615B and 311992CF000115A.
Willie Slade, Live Oak, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to refile his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence with supporting record documentation attached on his claim of an oral versus written sentencing discrepancy. Zill v. State, 162 So. 3d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).
GERBER, C.J., CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WILLIE SLADE v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-slade-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.