Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 21, 2023·No. 23-6291·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6291

WILLIE LEE MARTIN, III, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARY LOCKLEAR; TODD ISHEE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03021-BO)

Submitted: May 25, 2023 Decided: July 21, 2023

Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Martin, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Willie Lee Martin, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. Martin was released from incarceration during the pendency of this appeal; thus, his appeal of his request for injunctive relief is moot. See Rendelman v. Rouse, 569 F.3d 182, 186 (4th Cir. 2009). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error in the district court’s dismissal of Martin’s other claims. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in part as moot and affirm the remainder of the district court’s order. Martin v. Cooper, No. 5:22-ct-03021-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART,

AFFIRMED IN PART

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear, (4th Cir. 2023).

Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear (Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rendelman v. Rouse
569 F.3d 182 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)