Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 21, 2023
Docket23-6291
StatusUnpublished

This text of Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear (Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear, (4th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6291 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6291

WILLIE LEE MARTIN, III,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARY LOCKLEAR; TODD ISHEE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03021-BO)

Submitted: May 25, 2023 Decided: July 21, 2023

Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Lee Martin, III, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6291 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Willie Lee Martin, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. Martin was released from incarceration

during the pendency of this appeal; thus, his appeal of his request for injunctive relief is

moot. See Rendelman v. Rouse, 569 F.3d 182, 186 (4th Cir. 2009). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error in the district court’s dismissal of Martin’s other claims.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in part as moot and affirm the remainder of the district

court’s order. Martin v. Cooper, No. 5:22-ct-03021-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 2023). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rendelman v. Rouse
569 F.3d 182 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Willie Martin, III v. Mary Locklear, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-martin-iii-v-mary-locklear-ca4-2023.