Willie M. Hardy, Jr. v. Virginia Parole Board Clarence L. Jackson, Former Chairman

48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11024, 1995 WL 105296
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1995
Docket94-7189
StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1216 (Willie M. Hardy, Jr. v. Virginia Parole Board Clarence L. Jackson, Former Chairman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willie M. Hardy, Jr. v. Virginia Parole Board Clarence L. Jackson, Former Chairman, 48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11024, 1995 WL 105296 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

48 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Willie M. HARDY, JR., Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; Clarence L. Jackson, Former
Chairman, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 94-7189.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: February 16, 1995
Decided: March 14, 1995

Willie M. Hardy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Mary Elizabeth Shea, Offfice of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Hardy v. Virginia Parole Board, No. CA-94-916-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11024, 1995 WL 105296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-m-hardy-jr-v-virginia-parole-board-clarence-ca4-1995.