Willie Lavan v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-11-00405-CV
|
Willie Lavan |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company |
APPELLEE |
|
AND
NO. 02-11-00407-CV
|
Leroy Ross |
||
NO. 02-11-00408-CV
|
Floyd Townsend |
||
NO. 02-11-00409-CV
|
Gilbert McNeil |
||
NO. 02-11-00410-CV
|
Charles King |
||
NO. 02-11-00411-CV
|
Thomas Jackson |
||
NO. 02-11-00412-CV
|
Ted Flemings |
||
NO. 02-11-00414-CV
|
Charles Booker |
||
------------
FROM THE 96th District Court OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
On the court=s own motion, the above causes are hereby consolidated in this court. Each cause shall continue to bear its respective case number.
On January 13, 2012, we notified appellants that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in the above appeals informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss these appeals for want of prosecution unless appellants made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.
Because appellants have not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, it is the opinion of the court that these appeals should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).
Appellants shall pay all costs of the appeals, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: February 23, 2012
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Willie Lavan v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (Willie Lavan v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.