Willie L. Harris v. State of North Carolina
This text of 48 F.3d 1216 (Willie L. Harris v. State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
48 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Willie L. HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 94-7105.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted February 16, 1995.
Decided March 9, 1995.
Willie L. Harris, appellant pro se. Michael F. Easley, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-641 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11021, 1995 WL 95842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-l-harris-v-state-of-north-carolina-ca4-1995.