Willie Koehler v. Amoco Federal Credit Union and Reba Hankins

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-00498-CV Style: Willie Koehler v. Reba Hankins and Amoco Federal Credit Union Date motion filed*: May 28, 2013 Type of motion: Motion for appointment of counsel Party filing motion: Appellant, pro se Document to be filed:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due ____________

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

Appellant is not entitled to appointed counsel in this case. See Gibson v. Tolbert, 102 S.W.3d 710, 712 (Tex. 2003); Mustapha v. HSBC Bank USA, Nat’l Ass’n, No. 14-11-00112-CV, 2012 WL 273897, at *1 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 31, 2012, pet. Denied) (not designated for publication). Appellant’s motion is denied.

Judge's signature: __/s/ Sherry Radack_______________________________________  Acting individually

Date: ___July 18, 2013____________________________

* Absent emergency or a statement that the motion is unopposed, must wait ten days before acting on motion except for motion to extend time to file a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). Note: Single justice may grant or deny any request for relief properly sought by motion, except in a civil case a single justice should not: (1) act on a petition for an extraordinary writ or (2) dismiss or otherwise determine an appeal or a motion for rehearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.4(a).