Willie Jean Cherry Johnson v. James Franklin Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedSeptember 14, 1999
DocketA01-9603-GS-00056
StatusPublished

This text of Willie Jean Cherry Johnson v. James Franklin Johnson (Willie Jean Cherry Johnson v. James Franklin Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willie Jean Cherry Johnson v. James Franklin Johnson, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

IN T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E , A T J A C K S O N

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

) W IL L IE J E A N C H E R R Y JO H N S O N , ) S h e lb y C o u n ty C ir c u it C o u r t ) N o . 1 5 0 8 4 3 R .D .

V S . P la in tiff/A p p e lla n t. ) ) ) FL E I D C .A . N o . 0 2 A 0 1 - 9 9 0 1 - C V - 0 0 0 1 5 ) S e p te m b e r 1 4 , 1 9 9 9 J A M E S F R A N K L IN J O H N S O N , ) ) C e c il C r o w s o n , J r . D e fe n d a n t/A p p e lle e . ) A p p e lla te C o u r t C le r k ) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

F r o m th e C ir c u it C o u r t o f S h e lb y C o u n ty a t M e m p h is . H o n o r a b le R o b e r t L . C h ild e r s , J u d g e

R o n a ld D . K r e ls te in , M e m p h is , T e n n e s se e A tto rn e y fo r P la in tiff/A p p e lla n t.

D e n n is J . S o s s a m a n , M e m p h is , T e n n e s se e A tto r n e y fo r D e fe n d a n t/A p p e lle e .

O P IN IO N F IL E D :

A F F IR M E D A N D R E M A N D E D

F A R M E R , J .

C R A W F O R D , P .J ., W .S .: ( C o n c u rs ) L I L L A R D , J .: ( C o n c u rs ) P l a i n t if f W i ll ie J e a n C h e r r y J o h n s o n ( W i f e ) a p p e a l s th e tr ia l c o u rt’ s ju d g m e n t

d e n y in g h e r p e t i t i o n t o m o d i f y a f i n a l d i v o r c e d e c r e e p r e v i o u s ly e n t e re d b y t h e c o u r t i n D e c e m b e r

1 9 9 6 . W e a ff irm th e tria l c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t b a s e d u p o n o u r c o n c lu s io n th a t th e d is p o s itio n o f th is

c a s e i s c o n t r o l l e d b y t h i s c o u r t ’ s d e c i s i o n i n G i l l i l a n d v . S ta n le y , N o . 0 2 A 0 1 - 9 6 0 3 - G S - 0 0 0 5 6 , 1 9 9 7

W L 1 8 0 5 8 7 ( T e n n . A p p . A p r. 1 6 , 1 9 9 7 ) (n o p e r m . a p p . file d ).

T h e p a r tie s w e r e m a r r ie d in 1 9 6 7 a n d w e r e s e p a r a te d i n 1 9 9 4 a f te r tw e n t y - s e v e n y e a r s

o f m a r r ia g e . T h r o u g h o u t th i s tim e , D e f e n d a n t /A p p e lle e J a m e s F r a n k lin J o h n s o n ( H u s b a n d ) w a s o n

a c tiv e d u ty w ith th e U n ite d S ta te s M a rin e C o r p s . A fte r th e ir s e p a ra tio n , th e p a rtie s e n te re d in to a

m a r i t a l d i s s o l u t io n a g r e e m e n t ( M D A ) w h i c h p u r p o r te d t o d iv i d e t h e H u s b a n d ’ s m ilita r y r e tir e m e n t

b e n e fits . A s p e rtin e n t, th e M D A p r o v id e d th a t

H u s b a n d a g r e e s th a t W if e s h a ll r e c e i v e th e s u m o f $ 1 ,8 4 5 .0 0 p e r m o n th a s s u p p o rt c o m m e n c in g M a y 1 , 1 9 9 6 , a n d c o n tin u in g u n til F e b r u a ry 1 , 1 9 9 7 , a t w h i c h t i m e H u s b a n d w i l l b e g in r e c e iv i n g h is m i li ta r y re tire m e n t. In th e e v e n t th a t H u s b a n d ’s m ilita ry r e tir e m e n t c o m m e n c e s s o o n e r th a n F e b ru a ry 1 , 1 9 9 7 , s u p p o rt p a y m e n ts w ill s to p a s o f th a t d a te . In th e e v e n t th a t re tire m e n t d o e s n o t b e c o m e e ff e c tiv e u n til a fte r F e b r u a ry 1 , 1 9 9 7 , th e n a lim o n y w i ll c o n t in u e u n t il th e f i r s t o f th e m o n th f o llo w in g th e e f fe c tiv e d a te o f r e tir e m e n t. U p o n r e tir e m e n t, W ife s h a ll re c e iv e o n e -h a lf o f a ll m ilita ry re tir e m e n t b e n e f its d u e th e H u s b a n d .

. . . .

H u s b a n d f u r th e r a g r e e s th a t h e w ill p r o v i d e p r o p e r n o tic e to t h e a p p ro p r ia te m i li ta r y p a y d is b u r s e m e n t o f f ic e o f W if e ’s e n title m e n t t o r e c e i v e o n e - h a lf o f a ll r e t i r e m e n t b e n e f i t s H u s b a n d r e c e iv e s e ff e c tiv e w ith h is re tire m e n t fro m th e a c tiv e d u ty w ith th e U n ite d S t a t e s M a r i n e C o r p s . A c o p y o f th e l e t t e r m a k in g th e d e s i g n a ti o n s h a ll b e f o rw a rd e d to W ife w ith in 1 4 d a y s a fte r th e n o tic e h a s b e e n g i v e n to th e a p p r o p r ia te d is b u r s e m e n t o f f i c e . H u s b a n d a g r e e s th a t W i f e s h a ll b e e n title d to p r o v id e th e d is b u r s e m e n t o f f ic e w ith a c o p y o f th e [ M D A ] o r a n y o t h e r a p p ro p ria te o r d e r, in c lu d in g a Q u a lifie d D o m e s tic R e la tio n s O r d e r . H u s b a n d a g r e e s to e x e c u t e a Q u a l if ie d D o m e s tic R e l a tio n s O r d e r f o r e n tr y i n th is c a u s e a n d a g r e e s t o p r o v i d e a p p r o p r ia te in f o r m a tio n to c o u n s e l f o r W if e .

I n e n t e r in g th e f in a l d i v o r c e d e c r e e , th e t ria l c o u rt a d o p te d , a p p ro v e d a s e q u ita b le , a n d

in c o r p o r a te d b y r e fe re n c e th e te rm s a n d p ro v is io n s o f th e p a rtie s ’ M D A . In d o in g s o , th e tria l c o u rt

s p e c i f i c a l l y r e f e r r e d t o t h e M D A ’ s p r o v i s i o n s d i v i d i n g t h e H u s b a n d ’ s m i l i t a r y r e t ir e m e n t b e n e f it s :

T h e C o u r t s p e c if ic a lly a p p r o v e s th a t p o r tio n o f th e [ M D A ] w h i c h p r o v i d e s th a t [ th e W if e ] s h a ll b e e n tit l e d t o r e c e iv e 5 0 % o f a ll m i li ta r y r e t ir e m e n t b e n e f its d u e to [ th e H u s b a n d ] u p o n h is r e tir e m e n t f ro m a c t iv e d u ty w ith th e U n ite d S ta t e s M a r in e C o r p s .

T h e tria l c o u rt a lso se t fo rth c e rtain o rd e rs in th e fin a l d iv o rc e d e c re e th a t w e re

d e s ig n e d to e n s u r e c o m p lia n c e w ith th e M D A ’ s p r o v is io n s d iv id in g th e H u s b a n d ’ s m ilita ry

re tire m e n t b e n e fits . T h e tria l c o u rt o r d e re d

th a t th e C le rk o f th e C o u rt p r o v id e [ th e W if e ] w ith a c e rtif ie d c o p y o f th e F in a l D e c re e in a c c o rd a n c e w ith th e U n ifo r m e d S e rv ic e s F o rm e r S p o u s e ’ s P r o te c tio n A c t, 1 0 U .S .C . § 1 4 0 8 , s o th a t [ th e W if e ] m a y c o m p ly w ith F o r m D D 2 2 9 3 a n d r e c e iv e h e r s h a r e o f th e r e ti r e m e n t b e n e fits d u e a n d o w in g to [th e H u s b a n d ].

T h e t r ia l c o u r t a ls o o r d e re d “ th a t u p o n th e re tir e m e n t o f [ th e H u s b a n d ] f r o m a c tiv e d u ty , [ th e W if e ]

s h a ll r e c e iv e 5 0 % o f a ll r e ti r e m e n t b e n e f i t s d u e [ t h e H u s b a n d ] .” F in a ll y , t h e tr i a l c o u rt i n d i c a te d t h a t

it w a s r e t a i n i n g “ j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r t h i s m a t te r i n o r d e r t o e n f o r c e a ll rig h ts a n d r e m e d i e s w h i c h m a y

b e a v a i la b l e p u r s u a n t to t h e U n i f o r m e d S e r v i c e s F o r m e r S p o u s e s ’ P r o t e c tio n A c t, 1 0 U .S .C . § 1 4 0 8 .”

T h e W ife in itia te d th e p re s e n t p r o c e e d in g in M a y 1 9 9 8 w h e n s h e file d a p e titio n to

m o d if y th e f in a l d i v o r c e d e c r e e . A s g r o u n d s f o r m o d if ic a tio n , th e W if e ’s p e titio n c o n ta in e d th e

f o l l o w i n g a ll e g a t i o n s :

In a c c o rd a n c e w ith th e [M D A ] a n d th e F in a l D e cre e o f D iv o rc e , o n c e [th e H u s b a n d ] re tire d f ro m a c tiv e d u t y , [th e W ife ] b e g a n re c e iv in g h e r sh a r e o f [th e H u sb an d ’ s ] r e tir e m e n t b e n e f its . [ T h e W if e ] r e c e iv e d $ 1 ,4 4 6 .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1
0 U.S.C. § 1
§ 5
5 U.S.C. § 5
§ 3
8 U.S.C. § 3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Willie Jean Cherry Johnson v. James Franklin Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-jean-cherry-johnson-v-james-franklin-johnso-tennctapp-1999.