Willie James Sauls v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 22, 2014·No. 03-12-00544-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2014

NO. 03-12-00544-CR

Willie James Sauls, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. However,

there was error in the judgment and sentence that requires correction. Therefore, the Court

modifies the trial court’s judgment and sentence as follows: to reflect that appellant pleaded not

true to the two enhancement paragraphs. The judgment of conviction, as modified, is affirmed.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willie James Sauls v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Willie James Sauls v. State (Willie James Sauls v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.