Willie George Dixon, Jr. v. State of Florida
This text of Willie George Dixon, Jr. v. State of Florida (Willie George Dixon, Jr. v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-3367 _____________________________
WILLIE GEORGE DIXON, JR.,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.
August 16, 2018
PER CURIAM.
Willie George Dixon, Jr. raises three issues on appeal. The first, regarding the trial court’s failure to conduct a proper competency determination, requires reversal—which the State concedes. The other two we find to be without merit. The remedy is a remand for the trial court to conduct a nunc pro tunc competency evaluation; if one cannot be done, Dixon must receive a new trial. See Brooks v. State, 180 So. 3d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).
MAKAR, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin Foster Karpf, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Steven Edward Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Willie George Dixon, Jr. v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-george-dixon-jr-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.