Willie G. Smith v. Walton Residential Services

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 24, 2024·No. A24A1492·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 24, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1492. WILLIE G. SMITH v. WALTON RESIDENTIAL SERVICES.

This case began as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. Following an adverse ruling, defendant Willie Smith appealed to the superior court, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Smith then appealed directly to this Court. We lack jurisdiction.

Appeals from superior court decisions reviewing lower court decisions must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1), (b); Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Smith’s failure to follow the proper procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 05/24/2024

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willie G. Smith v. Walton Residential Services, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Willie G. Smith v. Walton Residential Services (Willie G. Smith v. Walton Residential Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Bullock v. Sand
581 S.E.2d 333 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)