Willie Eugene Crawford v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Willie Eugene Crawford v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

428 F.2d 1217

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 9, 1970·No. 28969_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal 1 by a state prisoner from denial by the district court of his petition for habeas corpus. Following a full hearing, the district court made full and complete findings of fact and concluded that appellant had failed to establish any basis for a collateral attack on his judgment of conviction and sentence by the state court. These findings cannot be said to be clearly erroneous in light of the support for them found both at the district court trial and the state record.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this ease is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal 1 by a state prisoner from denial by the district court of his petition for habeas corpus. Following a full hearing, the district court made full and complete findings of fact and concluded that appellant had failed to establish any basis for a collateral attack on his judgment of conviction and sentence by the state court. These findings cannot be said to be clearly erroneous in light of the support for them found both at the district court trial and the state record.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this ease is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

Willie Eugene Crawford v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 428 F.2d 1217 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

428 F.2d 1217 (Willie Eugene Crawford v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related