Willie Eugene Crawford v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Willie Eugene Crawford v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

428 F.2d 1217

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 9, 1970

Docket28969_1

StatusPublished

This text of 428 F.2d 1217 (Willie Eugene Crawford v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willie Eugene Crawford v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections, 428 F.2d 1217 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal 1 by a state prisoner from denial by the district court of his petition for habeas corpus. Following a full hearing, the district court made full and complete findings of fact and concluded that appellant had failed to establish any basis for a collateral attack on his judgment of conviction and sentence by the state court. These findings cannot be said to be clearly erroneous in light of the support for them found both at the district court trial and the state record.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this ease is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI