Willie Edward Davis v. Dan Lammar Cogdell and George Allen Gooling

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 28, 2012
Docket10-12-00023-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Willie Edward Davis v. Dan Lammar Cogdell and George Allen Gooling (Willie Edward Davis v. Dan Lammar Cogdell and George Allen Gooling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willie Edward Davis v. Dan Lammar Cogdell and George Allen Gooling, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00023-CV

WILLIE EDWARD DAVIS, Appellant v.

DAN LAMMAR COGDELL AND GEORGE ALLEN GOOLING, Appellees

From the 361st District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-001793-CV-361

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Willie Edward Davis, a prison inmate, appeals the adverse judgment rendered

against him on January 6, 2012. By letter dated February 23, 2012, the Clerk of this

Court notified Davis that the clerk’s record had not been filed because he had either

failed to pay or make arrangement to pay the clerk’s fee for preparation of the clerk’s

record. The Clerk also warned Davis that, unless he paid or made arrangement to pay

the clerk’s fee for preparation of the clerk’s record and notify the Court of the actions

taken within 21 days from the date of the letter, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). More than 21 days have passed, and Davis has

not made arrangement to pay the clerk’s fee for preparation of the clerk’s record and

has not notified the Court of the actions taken.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Id.

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R.

APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b); §

51.941(a) (West 2005); and § 51.208 (West Supp. 2011). Under these circumstances, we

suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX.

R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no

way eliminates or reduces the fees owed.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed March 28, 2012 [CV06]

Davis v. Cogdell Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Willie Edward Davis v. Dan Lammar Cogdell and George Allen Gooling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-edward-davis-v-dan-lammar-cogdell-and-georg-texapp-2012.