Willie Edward Brock v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Willie Edward Brock v. United States

451 F.2d 1209, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6943

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 24, 1971

Docket71-1391

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 451 F.2d 1209 (Willie Edward Brock v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willie Edward Brock v. United States, 451 F.2d 1209, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6943 (6th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant in this case pleaded guilty before a United States District Judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to robbery of a Federal Credit Union office, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (1970). He was arrested in hot pursuit after the robbery, during which pursuit his confederate was killed. These facts were established by appellant’s statement when his guilty plea was taken in full compliance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. He is now serving a sentence of 15 years.

This is an appeal from denial without hearing of a motion to vacate sentence filed before the same Judge who took the plea of guilty and administered appellant’s sentence. Appellant now contends that his guilty plea was involun *1210 tary because it was compelled by a confession which he alleges to have been coerced by unduly long detention.

We find no exceptional circumstances alleged in this § 2255 motion which would have required the Judge who took this plea to have granted an evidentiary hearing. See McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970).

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant in this case pleaded guilty before a United States District Judge in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan to robbery of a Federal Credit Union office, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (1970). He was arrested in hot pursuit after the robbery, during which pursuit his confederate was killed. These facts were established by appellant’s statement when his guilty plea was taken in full compliance with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. He is now serving a sentence of 15 years.

This is an appeal from denial without hearing of a motion to vacate sentence filed before the same Judge who took the plea of guilty and administered appellant’s sentence. Appellant now contends that his guilty plea was involun *1210 tary because it was compelled by a confession which he alleges to have been coerced by unduly long detention.

We find no exceptional circumstances alleged in this § 2255 motion which would have required the Judge who took this plea to have granted an evidentiary hearing. See McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970).

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

451 F.2d 1209, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-edward-brock-v-united-states-ca6-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack