Willie Deangelo Bigham v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Willie Deangelo Bigham v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 28, 2014

Docket14-0901

StatusPublished

This text of Willie Deangelo Bigham v. State of Florida (Willie Deangelo Bigham v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willie Deangelo Bigham v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

WILLIE DEANGELO BIGHAM, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-0901

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed September 29, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Willie Deangelo Bigham, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

ROWE, MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI