Willie D. Morris v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Willie D. Morris v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections

404 F.2d 74, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4669

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 2, 1968

Docket26596_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 404 F.2d 74 (Willie D. Morris v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willie D. Morris v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, 404 F.2d 74, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4669 (5th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a district court order denying the petition of a Florida convict for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant, represented by a public defender, was convicted on his plea of guilty to a charge of manslaughter. On February 25, 1966, he was sentenced to a term of six months to twenty years. His direct appeal was quashed on motion of the State; the Florida Supreme Court dismissed his petition for certiorari.

Appellant then filed his motion for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court, which denied the petition on the ground that the contentions lacked merit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, but granted leave to appeal in forma pawperis. Appellant has not been granted a certificate of probable cause by this Court, nor will such certificate be granted.

A review of the record clearly indicates that Morris has not availed himself of Florida Criminal Procedure Rule One, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix — the procedure for obtaining a hearing in the trial court *75 to determine the merits of his allegations. Until the available state remedies are exhausted, the merits of a petition for habeas corpus should not be considered by federal courts. (28 U.S.C. § 2254; Milton v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1968, 396 F.2d 214; Texas v. Payton, 5th Cir. 1968, 390 F.2d 261). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is from a district court order denying the petition of a Florida convict for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant, represented by a public defender, was convicted on his plea of guilty to a charge of manslaughter. On February 25, 1966, he was sentenced to a term of six months to twenty years. His direct appeal was quashed on motion of the State; the Florida Supreme Court dismissed his petition for certiorari.

Appellant then filed his motion for writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court, which denied the petition on the ground that the contentions lacked merit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal, but granted leave to appeal in forma pawperis. Appellant has not been granted a certificate of probable cause by this Court, nor will such certificate be granted.

A review of the record clearly indicates that Morris has not availed himself of Florida Criminal Procedure Rule One, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix — the procedure for obtaining a hearing in the trial court *75 to determine the merits of his allegations. Until the available state remedies are exhausted, the merits of a petition for habeas corpus should not be considered by federal courts. (28 U.S.C. § 2254; Milton v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1968, 396 F.2d 214; Texas v. Payton, 5th Cir. 1968, 390 F.2d 261). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

404 F.2d 74, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-d-morris-v-louie-l-wainwright-director-division-of-corrections-ca5-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack