Willie D. Hubbard Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 25, 2014
Docket09-14-00226-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Willie D. Hubbard Jr. v. State (Willie D. Hubbard Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willie D. Hubbard Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00226-CR ____________________

WILLIE D. HUBBARD JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 13-03-03070 CR ________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 9, 2014, Willie D. Hubbard Jr. filed a notice of appeal from a

sentence imposed on January 30, 2014. We notified the parties that the notice of

appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. On May 30, 2014, the appellant

filed a motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal.

Hubbard filed a motion for new trial within thirty days of sentencing;

therefore, his notice of appeal was due April 30, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.2(a)(2). The trial court signed an order granting the motion for new trial, but

subsequently set aside the order because the order had not been signed before the

motion for new trial was overruled by operation of law. See State v. Bates, 889

S.W.2d 306, 310 (Tex. Crim. App. 1994). Hubbard filed a notice of appeal within

fifteen days after the deadline for filing a notice of appeal, but his motion for

extension of time was filed late. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. “When a notice of

appeal, but no motion for extension of time, is filed within the fifteen-day period,

the court of appeals lacks jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any

manner other than by dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction.” Olivo v. State, 918

S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Freeman v. State, 330 S.W.3d 922, 922

(Tex. App.—Beaumont 2011, no pet.). We deny the appellant’s motion for

extension of time to file notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice

Opinion Delivered June 25, 2014 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bates
889 S.W.2d 306 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Freeman v. State
330 S.W.3d 922 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Willie D. Hubbard Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-d-hubbard-jr-v-state-texapp-2014.