Willie Clisby, Cross-Appellant v. Charlie Jones, Warden, Holman Unit, Alabama Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellee

920 F.2d 720, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22296, 1990 WL 209315
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 17, 1990·No. 89-7209·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

*721 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested , a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willie Clisby, Cross-Appellant v. Charlie Jones, Warden, Holman Unit, Alabama Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellee, 920 F.2d 720, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 22296, 1990 WL 209315 (11th Cir. 1990).

920 F.2d 720 (Willie Clisby, Cross-Appellant v. Charlie Jones, Warden, Holman Unit, Alabama Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related