Willie Cantrell v. L.S. McEwen

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Willie Cantrell v. L.S. McEwen. Read the opinion of the Court — 449 F. App'x 698
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 19, 2011·No. 09-55386·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 19 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIE DORSEY CANTRELL, No. 09-55386

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00354-W-POR

v. ORDER L. S. MCEWEN, Acting Warden; et al.,

Respondents-Appellees.

Before: SCHROEDER and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and SEEBORG, District Judge.*

The panel, as constituted above, has unanimously voted to deny the Petition

for Rehearing. Judges Schroeder and Gould voted to deny the Petition for

Rehearing En Banc, and Judge Seeborg has so recommended.

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc has been circulated to the full court, and

no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.

App. P. 35.

* The Honorable Richard Seeborg, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc are

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Willie Cantrell v. L.S. McEwen, (9th Cir. 2011).

Willie Cantrell v. L.S. McEwen (Willie Cantrell v. L.S. McEwen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.