Willie Brown v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Willie Brown v. United States

253 F.2d 587, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3900

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 19, 1958

Docket16815

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 253 F.2d 587 (Willie Brown v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Willie Brown v. United States, 253 F.2d 587, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3900 (5th Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possessing and concealing untaxpaid distilled spirits in violation of Title 26 U.S. C. Sections 5008(b) (-1) and 7206(4) and was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and one day. His prime complaint on appeal is that the evidence was not sufficient to support the judgment of conviction. That insistence is so obviously unsound as not to justify discussion. The same is also true as to his other specifications of error, i.e. allowing his codefendant, Van Charles, to testify as a witness for the government, and claimed errors in the court’s charge to the jury, to which no objections were made at the time of trial. The judgment is therefore

. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of possessing and concealing untaxpaid distilled spirits in violation of Title 26 U.S. C. Sections 5008(b) (-1) and 7206(4) and was sentenced to imprisonment for one year and one day. His prime complaint on appeal is that the evidence was not sufficient to support the judgment of conviction. That insistence is so obviously unsound as not to justify discussion. The same is also true as to his other specifications of error, i.e. allowing his codefendant, Van Charles, to testify as a witness for the government, and claimed errors in the court’s charge to the jury, to which no objections were made at the time of trial. The judgment is therefore

. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 F.2d 587, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 3900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-brown-v-united-states-ca5-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack