Willie Arthur Jackson v. Shalanda Meshell Jackson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 6, 2017
Docket05-16-01517-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Willie Arthur Jackson v. Shalanda Meshell Jackson (Willie Arthur Jackson v. Shalanda Meshell Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willie Arthur Jackson v. Shalanda Meshell Jackson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 6, 2017

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01517-CV

WILLIE ARTHUR JACKSON, Appellant V. SHALANDA MESHELL JACKSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-02736

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By

postcard dated December 29, 2016, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We

directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that

failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated December 29,

2016, we informed appellant the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned

appellant that failure to file the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal

of this appeal without further notice. By letter dated January 31, 2017, we informed appellant

the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We

directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s

record or to provide written documentation he had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of

this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the

required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this

appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b) (c).

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE

161517F.P05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

WILLIE ARTHUR JACKSON, Appellant On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-16-01517-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-02736. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. SHALANDA MESHELL JACKSON, Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart Appellee participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

Judgment entered March 6, 2017.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Willie Arthur Jackson v. Shalanda Meshell Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-arthur-jackson-v-shalanda-meshell-jackson-texapp-2017.