Willie ALLEN Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the CITY OF MOBILE Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

466 F.2d 122, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6652, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7958, 4 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1290
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 17, 1972
Docket72-1009
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 466 F.2d 122 (Willie ALLEN Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the CITY OF MOBILE Et Al., Defendants-Appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Willie ALLEN Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. the CITY OF MOBILE Et Al., Defendants-Appellees, 466 F.2d 122, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6652, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7958, 4 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1290 (5th Cir. 1972).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs, black officers of the Mobile Police Department, sued the defendants claiming that various practices of the Police Department discriminated against Negro officers on account of their race.

We agree with the plaintiffs’ statement contained in their brief that the district court, in granting substantially all relief sought on the subject of racial assignment of officers, in ordering changes to reduce or eliminate the discriminatory impact of seniority and service ratings, and in requiring that instruction in intergroup relations be given to all officers and that the defendants undertake affirmative efforts to recruit black officers, has made possible substantial progress toward the achievement of the elimination of unlawful racial discrimination and the elimination of the vestiges of past discrimination.

Plaintiffs’ sole issue on this appeal, however, is that the district court, in fashioning a remedy, did not enjoin the use of a written test, which they contend is discriminatory as to blacks, given to promote officers to the rank of sergeant. The district court found that the test is job-related. We affirm the judgment of Chief Judge Pittman on the basis of his order and decree reported at 331 F.Supp. 1134 (S.D.Ala.1971).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Bramer
180 F.3d 699 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
Covington v. Beaumont Independent School District
714 F. Supp. 1402 (E.D. Texas, 1989)
Isaacs v. Kemp
782 F.2d 896 (Eleventh Circuit, 1986)
Bailey v. Binyon
583 F. Supp. 923 (N.D. Illinois, 1984)
United States v. Housing Authority of City of Chickasaw
504 F. Supp. 716 (S.D. Alabama, 1980)
Allen v. City of Mobile
464 F. Supp. 433 (S.D. Alabama, 1978)
Brown v. Moore
428 F. Supp. 1123 (S.D. Alabama, 1976)
Bolden v. City of Mobile, Alabama
423 F. Supp. 384 (S.D. Alabama, 1976)
Wade v. Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service
528 F.2d 508 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
City of Minneapolis v. Richardson
239 N.W.2d 197 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1976)
Guesnon v. Board of Liquidation
396 F. Supp. 541 (E.D. Louisiana, 1975)
Wade v. Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service
372 F. Supp. 126 (N.D. Mississippi, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F.2d 122, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 6652, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7958, 4 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/willie-allen-et-al-plaintiffs-appellants-v-the-city-of-mobile-et-al-ca5-1972.