Willick v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Willick v. State

402 So. 2d 68, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20746

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 12, 1981·No. No. 80-988·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is affirmed. However, as the State concedes, the trial judge in his probation revocation order found a violation of three conditions of probation whereas the testimony at the hearing and the judge’s oral findings on the record only support a finding of violation as to two of the three conditions.

Accordingly, this cause is remanded so that the trial judge can amend the order of revocation of probation and exclude therefrom any reference to a violation of special condition (10).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH.

LETTS, C. J., MOORE, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause is affirmed. However, as the State concedes, the trial judge in his probation revocation order found a violation of three conditions of probation whereas the testimony at the hearing and the judge’s oral findings on the record only support a finding of violation as to two of the three conditions.

Accordingly, this cause is remanded so that the trial judge can amend the order of revocation of probation and exclude therefrom any reference to a violation of special condition (10).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH.

LETTS, C. J., MOORE, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Willick v. State, 402 So. 2d 68, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20746 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

402 So. 2d 68 (Willick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related