Williams's Ex'r v. Williams

General Court of Virginia

Williams's Ex'r v. Williams

1 H. & J. 752

DecidedOctober 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 1 H. & J. 752 (Williams's Ex'r v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams's Ex'r v. Williams, 1 H. & J. 752 (Va. Super. Ct. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

Chase, Ch. J.

If the plea has been put in by the clerk, at the request of counsel, it is to stand as the plea of-the. counsel. The court cannot give leave to withdraw the pica to permit the defendant to plead ii\l debets The plea of noil est factum would be a full defence. If it had been pleaded and demurred to, the court would have adjudged if the proper plea, and overruled the demurrer.

Key, then moved the court for leave to withdraw the plea of payment for the purpose of pleading nort cst factum.

Gíiatíteu by the. court, oh payment of the costs which have accrued at the present term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chase, Ch. J.

If the plea has been put in by the clerk, at the request of counsel, it is to stand as the plea of-the. counsel. The court cannot give leave to withdraw the pica to permit the defendant to plead ii\l debets The plea of noil est factum would be a full defence. If it had been pleaded and demurred to, the court would have adjudged if the proper plea, and overruled the demurrer.

Key, then moved the court for leave to withdraw the plea of payment for the purpose of pleading nort cst factum.

Gíiatíteu by the. court, oh payment of the costs which have accrued at the present term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 H. & J. 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamss-exr-v-williams-vagensess-1805.