Williamson v. Wilcox

63 Miss. 335
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Arnold, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Thére is testimony to the effect that after he had voluntarily appeared before appellant, as mayor of the town of Hazlehurst, appellee insisted or consented that the question of his violating the ordinances of the town should be at once disposed of, and that for this purpose he waived affidavit being made and warrant being issued. The legal effect of this evidence, if credited by the jury, should have been submitted to them on proper instructions from the court, as appellant sought to do. If this testimony was true, it established a complete defense to the action. For a purely private injury one cannot maintain a suit when he has consented to the act which produced the injury. The maxim, volenti non fit [338] injuria, applies and controls in such case. Broom’s Leg. Max. 268; 1 Whart. Cr. L., § 751b; Cooley on Torts 163; Ill. Cent R. R. Co. v. Allen, 39 Ill. 205; Pillow v. Bushnell, 5 Barb. 156.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williamson v. Wilcox, 63 Miss. 335 (Mich. 1885).

63 Miss. 335 (Williamson v. Wilcox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert L. Pierson v. J. L. Ray
352 F.2d 213 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
State Ex Rel. Powell v. Moore
174 So. 2d 352 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Erie R. v. Reigherd
166 F. 247 (Sixth Circuit, 1909)