Williamson v. Wilcox

63 Miss. 335
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 Miss. 335 (Williamson v. Wilcox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williamson v. Wilcox, 63 Miss. 335 (Mich. 1885).

Opinion

Arnold, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Thére is testimony to the effect that after he had voluntarily appeared before appellant, as mayor of the town of Hazlehurst, appellee insisted or consented that the question of his violating the ordinances of the town should be at once disposed of, and that for this purpose he waived affidavit being made and warrant being issued. The legal effect of this evidence, if credited by the jury, should have been submitted to them on proper instructions from the court, as appellant sought to do. If this testimony was true, it established a complete defense to the action. For a purely private injury one cannot maintain a suit when he has consented to the act which produced the injury. The maxim, volenti non fit [338]*338injuria, applies and controls in such case. Broom’s Leg. Max. 268; 1 Whart. Cr. L., § 751b; Cooley on Torts 163; Ill. Cent R. R. Co. v. Allen, 39 Ill. 205; Pillow v. Bushnell, 5 Barb. 156.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert L. Pierson v. J. L. Ray
352 F.2d 213 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
State Ex Rel. Powell v. Moore
174 So. 2d 352 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Erie R. v. Reigherd
166 F. 247 (Sixth Circuit, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Miss. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-wilcox-miss-1885.