Williamson v. State

76 So. 637, 115 Miss. 716
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1917·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The jury could have found from the evidence that Ode Williamson provoked the difficulty with the deceased by going into the house and attempting to shoot him, but, failing so to do, abandoned the difficulty and fled, and while attempting in good faith to escape, was pursued and attacked by deceased and forced to kill him in self-defense. Consequently the state’s fourth instruction should not have been granted. Smith v. State, 75 Miss. 553, 23 So. 260; Patterson v. State, 75 Miss. 675, 23 So. [720]*720647; Lofton v. State, 79 Miss. 734, 31 So. 420; Jones v. State, 84 Miss. 194, 36 So. 243; note to State v. Gordon, 109 Am. St. Rep. 808 et seq.; 13 R. C. L. 834.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williamson v. State, 76 So. 637, 115 Miss. 716 (Mich. 1917).

76 So. 637 (Williamson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. State
420 So. 2d 1381 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1982)
Lee v. State
103 So. 233 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)
Adams v. State
101 So. 437 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)