Williamson v. State

150 S.E.2d 728, 114 Ga. App. 255, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 702
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 6, 1966
Docket42128
StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E.2d 728 (Williamson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williamson v. State, 150 S.E.2d 728, 114 Ga. App. 255, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 702 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

Nichols, Presiding Judge.

1. “Where a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty in a criminal case is made after the sentence is entered in writing and handed to the clerk, the granting or refusal thereof is in the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be set aside unless abused.” King v. State, 91 Ga. App. 388 (85 SE2d 637).

2. In the present case where the defendant was represented by counsel at the time the plea of guilty was entered and where during his statement to the court in connection therewith the defendant admitted every element of the crime alleged in the indictment, and where the motion to withdraw the plea of guilty was not made until three weeks after the sentence was entered in writing and delivered to the clerk it was not an abuse of discretion to overrule such motion to withdraw the plea of guilty.

Judgment affirmed.

Hall and Deen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. State
85 S.E.2d 637 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 S.E.2d 728, 114 Ga. App. 255, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-state-gactapp-1966.