Williamson v. State
This text of 295 S.E.2d 305 (Williamson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Williamson appeals from the overruling of demurrers to indictments charging him with the offense of criminal defamation. 1
Constrained by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Gooding v. Wilson, 405 U. S. 518 (92 SC 1103, 31 LE2d 408) (1974), we hold that the requisite element of Code Ann. § 26-2804 — a communication which “tends to provoke a breach of the peace” — is vague and overbroad under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. See also Ashton v. Kentucky, 384 U. S. 195, 200 (86 SC 1407, 16 LE2d 469) (1966).
It should be noted that the General Assembly now has limited to “fighting words” the maximum outreach of the breach of the peace provision of the opprobrious language statute, Code Ann. § 26-2610 *852 (a), consistent with Gooding v. Wilson, supra. The equivalent language contained in the statute here in question remains unchanged.
Judgment reversed.
On motion for rehearing, the opinion of July 8,1982, has been withdrawn, and the judgment of that date vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
295 S.E.2d 305, 249 Ga. 851, 9 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1703, 1982 Ga. LEXIS 1211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-state-ga-1982.