Williamson v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Williamson v. State

578 So. 2d 287, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 256, 1991 WL 70218

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMarch 22, 1991

Docket1900547

StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 287 (Williamson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williamson v. State, 578 So. 2d 287, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 256, 1991 WL 70218 (Ala. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

KENNEDY, Justice.

The defendant, who is indigent, argues that the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in affirming that portion of the trial court’s judgment ordering him to pay attorney fees. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that because the defendant did not object to the imposition of attorney fees at sentencing he could not on appeal complain of that imposition of fees. For this proposition the court cited McCord v. State, 501 So.2d 520 (Ala.Cr.App.1987), as authority. Although we do not agree that McCord v. State stands for this proposition, we deny the writ. At sentencing, it is not uncommon for trial courts to order indigent defendants to pay attorney fees, and, in this case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in doing so. Therefore, we deny the defendant’s petition for a writ of certiorari.

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KENNEDY, Justice.

The defendant, who is indigent, argues that the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in affirming that portion of the trial court’s judgment ordering him to pay attorney fees. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that because the defendant did not object to the imposition of attorney fees at sentencing he could not on appeal complain of that imposition of fees. For this proposition the court cited McCord v. State, 501 So.2d 520 (Ala.Cr.App.1987), as authority. Although we do not agree that McCord v. State stands for this proposition, we deny the writ. At sentencing, it is not uncommon for trial courts to order indigent defendants to pay attorney fees, and, in this case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in doing so. Therefore, we deny the defendant’s petition for a writ of certiorari.

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 287, 1991 Ala. LEXIS 256, 1991 WL 70218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-state-ala-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack