Williamson v. Soldiers Bonus Board

197 N.W. 257, 158 Minn. 532, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 915
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 29, 1924
DocketNo. 23,832
StatusPublished

This text of 197 N.W. 257 (Williamson v. Soldiers Bonus Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williamson v. Soldiers Bonus Board, 197 N.W. 257, 158 Minn. 532, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 915 (Mich. 1924).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari to the Soldiers Bonus Board to review the disallowance, on August 16, 1921, of the relator’s claim for a bonus, and the approval, on December 11, 1921, of such disallowance by the board of review. The writ was served on the adjutant general, who appeared specially and objected to the jurisdiction of the court on several grounds. We do not stop to consider them because in our opinion the relator cannot prevail on the merits. The claim was disallowed on the ground that relator failed to prove that he was a resident of the state of Minnesota when he entered upon active duty in the military forces of the United States. In affirming the action of the bonus board, the board of review made this statement: “After a careful consideration of all the evidence in the ease, this board finds that the applicant was not a bona fide resident of the State of Minnesota at time of enlistment.”

In In re Hunt, 151 Minn. 45, 51, 185 N. W. 943, the effect of the findings of these boards, when their action is reviewed in this court, was stated as follows: “Findings of fact of boards of this character are conclusive in certiorari, unless it is made to appear that a wrong principle of law was applied or there has been a demonstrable mistake of fact.”

A careful examination of the return has satisfied us that there was ample evidence to justify the board in concluding that relator was not a resident of this state when he was mustered into the military service of the United States.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Hunt
185 N.W. 943 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 N.W. 257, 158 Minn. 532, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-soldiers-bonus-board-minn-1924.