Williamson v. Payne

118 S.E. 598, 30 Ga. App. 652, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 593
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 16, 1923·No. 14000·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Where a landlord rent's for a stipulated amount of the crop as rental, and breaches the contract by refusing to admit the tenant into possession, the tenant’s measure of damages is the net profits which the tenant could have made out of the contract. While in such a case the tenant’s damage is more or less contingent and speculative, damages are nevertheless recoverable where the- evidence furnishes sufficient, data to enable a jury to make a just and fair estimate of the damage, giving due consideration to what the tenant himself, in the performance of the contract, might have actually produced upon the premises. See Nicholson v. Nicholson, 29 Ga. App. 692 (116 S. E. 321), and cases there cited.

2. Applying the above principle, the petition set ouf the proper measure [653] of damages and was otherwise good against demurrer, and the evidence furnished sufficient data to authorize the jury to find for the plaintiff the amount of the verdict. ■ ,

Decided July 16, 1923. Bay & Bay, for plaintiff in error. G. W. Westmoreland, P. Cooley; contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williamson v. Payne, 118 S.E. 598, 30 Ga. App. 652, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 593 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

118 S.E. 598 (Williamson v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dopheide v. Schoeppner
163 N.W.2d 360 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1968)
Shiver v. Burkett
39 S.E.2d 431 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1946)
Roland v. Floyd
185 S.E. 580 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Levy, Brother & Co. v. Allen
185 S.E. 369 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)