Williamson v. Heath

Court of Appeals of Texas

Williamson v. Heath

108 S.W. 983, 49 Tex. Civ. App. 254, 1908 Tex. App. LEXIS 56

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 18, 1908

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 108 S.W. 983 (Williamson v. Heath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williamson v. Heath, 108 S.W. 983, 49 Tex. Civ. App. 254, 1908 Tex. App. LEXIS 56 (Tex. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

REESE, Associate Justice.

— The contract of Williamson was not alone a verbal guarantee that the bull was a breeder, but that he would refund the purchase money, less the value of the bull for beef, upon satisfactory proof that the bull was barren. Appellee had no cause of action until this satisfactory proof was made, and this was not done until within two years of the filing of the suit. There was no unreasonable delay on appellee’s part. We hold that the two years statute applies. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

REESE, Associate Justice.

— The contract of Williamson was not alone a verbal guarantee that the bull was a breeder, but that he would refund the purchase money, less the value of the bull for beef, upon satisfactory proof that the bull was barren. Appellee had no cause of action until this satisfactory proof was made, and this was not done until within two years of the filing of the suit. There was no unreasonable delay on appellee’s part. We hold that the two years statute applies. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 S.W. 983, 49 Tex. Civ. App. 254, 1908 Tex. App. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-heath-texapp-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack