Williamson v. Haynes Best Western of Alexandria, Inc.

940 So. 2d 648, 2006 La. LEXIS 3067
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williamson v. Haynes Best Western of Alexandria, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 940 So. 2d 648
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 3, 2006·No. No. 2006-CC-1928·Published

Opinion

In re Hayes, H.L. Mr. & Mrs.; Maryland Casualty Ins. Co.; American General Fire and Casualty Company; Haynes Best Western of Alexandria, Inc.; — Defendants); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. F, No. 1995-16175; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2006-C-0705.

Granted. Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate a causal relationship between defendants’ alleged fraud or ill practice and the obtaining of the judgment. See Ward v. Pennington, 523 So.2d 1286 (La.1988). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and summary judgment is hereby granted in favor of defendants, dismissing plaintiffs’ action for nullity.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant and docket. JOHNSON, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williamson v. Haynes Best Western of Alexandria, Inc., 940 So. 2d 648, 2006 La. LEXIS 3067 (La. 2006).

940 So. 2d 648 (Williamson v. Haynes Best Western of Alexandria, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ward v. Pennington
523 So. 2d 1286 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1988)