Williamson v. Daniel
This text of 25 U.S. 568 (Williamson v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The first bequest to Patsy Hendrick would pass the slaves therein mentioned to her absolutely', were not this absolute estate qualified by the subsequent limitation over, if either of the testator’s grand children, Patsy-Hendrick, or Jesse Daniel Austin, should die without a lawful heir of their bodies, that the other should heir, its estate. We think these words convert the absolute estate previously given, into an estate tail; and, if so, since slaves are personal property, the limitation over is too remote.
There are no words in the will which restrain thfe dying-without issue to the time of the death of the legatee.- ■ The remainder over is to take effect whenever either of the immediate legatees should die without a lawful heir of his or her body. The gift in remainder is a gift to the stock, and is limited over on a contingency too remote to be allowed by the policy of the law.
*570 The second point is, we believe, well settled. The issue is, we believe, universally considered as following the mother, unless they be separated from each other by the terms of the instrument which disposes of the mother.
Decree affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 U.S. 568, 6 L. Ed. 731, 12 Wheat. 568, 1827 U.S. LEXIS 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-daniel-scotus-1827.