Williamson v. Cowan
This text of 49 So. 3d 867 (Williamson v. Cowan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael M. Williamson, Appellant, challenges the lack of findings in the trial court’s modified final judgment for dissolution of marriage to impute income for child support purposes following his layoff from Boeing Satellite Systems. Instead, the final judgment found the increase in income earned by Wendy T. Cowan, Appellee, constituted the substantial change of circumstances warranting the modification of child support. The record does not include a hearing transcript to assist our review.
Because Appellant never challenged the adequacy of the findings in a motion for rehearing, we determine that the issue was not properly preserved for appellate review. See Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 So. 3d 867, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 19766, 2010 WL 5184655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-cowan-fladistctapp-2010.