Williamson v. Commonwealth

349 S.W.2d 825
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedSeptember 29, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 349 S.W.2d 825 (Williamson v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williamson v. Commonwealth, 349 S.W.2d 825 (Ky. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Raymond Williamson has moved for an appeal from a judgment imposing a fine of $200 and a jail sentence of 120 days following his conviction of possessing alcoholic beverages for the purpose of sale in dry territory.

The evidence upon which the conviction was based was obtained in the execution of a search warrant. The defendant made appropriate objections to the admission of the evidence on the ground that the affidavit upon which the warrant was issued was defective. The sole ground of appeal is that the court erred in admitting the evidence.

The affidavit stated that the defendant “now has in possession” alcoholic beverages in a described automobile and that “knowledge of these facts was gained in the following manner, to-wit: Personal knowledge.”

Under the decision in Henson v. Commonwealth, Ky., 347 S.W.2d 546, the affi[826]*826davit was insufficient because it did not state how and when the affiant’s observation was made. The Attorney General concedes error.

The motion for an appeal is sustained and the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Davenport
366 S.W.2d 171 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
349 S.W.2d 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1961.