Williamson v. Carnan

1 G. & J. 184
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 1, 1829·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Buchanan, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The order of the Commissioners of Baltimore County, on the 13th of December, 1827, confirming the report of the commissioners appointed by the Levy Court of that county, and directing and authorising the old road to be shut up, placed the premises over which it formerly run, under the controul of the appellant to whom the land belonged, and gave him the same right of user of the land of that road, that he had of the rest of his estate. And we think that the subsequent order of the Court of Chancery, does so materially affect the right and interests of the appellant as to bring the case within the principle of Thompson [216] vs. McKim, heretofore decided by this court, and form a fit subject of appeal.

The motion, therefore, to dismiss these appeals, is overruled.

MOTION OVERRULED.

Earle, J. dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williamson v. Carnan, 1 G. & J. 184 (Md. 1829).

1 G. & J. 184 (Williamson v. Carnan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pack Shack, Inc. v. Howard County
808 A.2d 795 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2002)
Howard County v. Pack Shack, Inc.
773 A.2d 612 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Board of License Commissioners v. Corridor Wine, Inc.
761 A.2d 916 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2000)
Vonoppenfeld v. State
454 A.2d 402 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1983)
Harford County Education Ass'n v. Board of Education
380 A.2d 1041 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1977)
Criminal Injuries Compensation Board v. Gould
331 A.2d 55 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1975)
Tyler v. Baltimore County
259 A.2d 307 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1969)
Wingert v. State
103 A. 437 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1918)
Duvall v. Waters
1 Md. Ch. 569 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1827)