Williamson v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williamson v. Brown

173 A.D.2d 207

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 173 A.D.2d 207 (Williamson v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williamson v. Brown, 173 A.D.2d 207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated October 6, 1989, which, after a hearing, ordered that petitioner forfeit ten days’ pay upon the finding that petitioner wrongfully received items without tendering payment, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and. the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Jerome Hornblass, J.], entered May 24, 1990), is dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner was found to have accepted food and soft drinks from the operators of a diner without paying for them. The Hearing Officer’s finding that the petitioner’s testimony was not credible, in conjunction with the testimony of disinterested investigators of the Internal Affairs Division, constituted substantial evidence in support of the determination of guilt. (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443.) Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated October 6, 1989, which, after a hearing, ordered that petitioner forfeit ten days’ pay upon the finding that petitioner wrongfully received items without tendering payment, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and. the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Jerome Hornblass, J.], entered May 24, 1990), is dismissed, without costs.

Petitioner was found to have accepted food and soft drinks from the operators of a diner without paying for them. The Hearing Officer’s finding that the petitioner’s testimony was not credible, in conjunction with the testimony of disinterested investigators of the Internal Affairs Division, constituted substantial evidence in support of the determination of guilt. (Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443.) Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.D.2d 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-brown-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack