Williamson v. Brazell
This text of 225 S.E.2d 304 (Williamson v. Brazell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The only enumerated error in this appeal is that the trial court erred and abused its discretion in modifying the visitation rights of the appellee under a final divorce decree as there was no evidence to show there had been a change of conditions since the date of the decree which substantially affected the welfare of the children.
The final decree provides for the father to have "reasonable visitation rights” as opposed to specific visitation periods. The trial court carefully considered the testimony of both parties and was authorized, but not required, to find there had been a denial of reasonable visitation rights to the father. The trial court modified the final decree to require specific visitation periods and the terms of its modification order are fair and reasonable.
This case is controlled' by the ruling in Davis v. [799]*799Coggins, 232 Ga. 508, 509 (207 SE2d 490) (1974), and Howell v. Howell, 232 Ga. 537 (207 SE2d 492) (1974). We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in this case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 S.E.2d 304, 236 Ga. 798, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-brazell-ga-1976.