Williamson v. Ashford
This text of Williamson v. Ashford (Williamson v. Ashford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 17-JUN-2021 12:00 PM Dkt. 13 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
GREGORY WILLIAMSON, Petitioner, vs.
THE HONORABLE JAMES H. ASHFORD, Judge of the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,
and
ALLIANCE PERSONNEL, INC., Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 13-1-1840)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Johnson, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of petitioner Gregory Williamson’s
“Emergency Second Supplement Mandamus Writ to the Emergency Non-
Hearing Motion of August 15, 2020,” which was filed as a petition
for writ of mandamus on June 15, 2021, the documents attached
thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it
appears that the original petition for writ of mandamus was
denied by order entered on September 4, 2020, and petitioner
fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right
to relief from this court. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200,
204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner
demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack
of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
obtain the requested action; a writ of mandamus is not intended
to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial
courts, cure a mere legal error, or serve as a legal remedy in
lieu of normal appellate procedures). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
mandamus is denied.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the
appellate court shall process the petition without payment of the
filing fees.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 17, 2021.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Ronald G. Johnson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williamson v. Ashford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamson-v-ashford-haw-2021.