Williamson ex rel. Wallis v. Perkins

General Court of Virginia

Williamson ex rel. Wallis v. Perkins

1 H. & J. 449

General Court of Virginia·Decided September 15, 1803·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The Court.

The return on the fieri facias is defective for want of a specification of the property; and the endorsement, by way of assignment, of the judgment from Williamson to Wallis, is an acknowledgment of satisfaction by the plaintiff from the defendant,' through Wallis, in express terms, and appears as part of the return itself; and this idea is confirmed by the sheriff’s return on the venditioni expo-* nis, “countermanded by plaintiff.”

YeNDITIONI EXPONAS AND RETURN QUASHED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court.

The return on the fieri facias is defective for want of a specification of the property; and the endorsement, by way of assignment, of the judgment from Williamson to Wallis, is an acknowledgment of satisfaction by the plaintiff from the defendant,' through Wallis, in express terms, and appears as part of the return itself; and this idea is confirmed by the sheriff’s return on the venditioni expo-* nis, “countermanded by plaintiff.”

YeNDITIONI EXPONAS AND RETURN QUASHED.

Williamson ex rel. Wallis v. Perkins, 1 H. & J. 449 (Va. Super. Ct. 1803).

Pincite

1 H. & J. 449 (Williamson ex rel. Wallis v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related