Williamsburg Iron and Wire Works, Incorporated v. . Kuhn
115 N.E. 1054, 220 N.Y. 647, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1102
This text of 115 N.E. 1054 (Williamsburg Iron and Wire Works, Incorporated v. . Kuhn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Williamsburg Iron and Wire Works, Incorporated v. . Kuhn, 115 N.E. 1054, 220 N.Y. 647, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1102 (N.Y. 1917).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chaser Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ.; Hiscook, Ch. J., and Collin, J., dissent on the ground that the complaint did not allege any excuse for noncompliance with the contract and the evidence did not show such compliance. Not sitting: McLaughlin, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
115 N.E. 1054, 220 N.Y. 647, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamsburg-iron-and-wire-works-incorporated-v-kuhn-ny-1917.