Williamsburg Care Co., LP D/B/A Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta
This text of Williamsburg Care Co., LP D/B/A Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta (Williamsburg Care Co., LP D/B/A Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00823-CV
WILLIAMSBURG CARE CO., LP d/b/a Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare, Appellant
v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta, Deceased; et Jesus ACOSTA, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta, Deceased; et al., Appellees
From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-CI-16420 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 15, 2015
MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED
On November 25, 2013, this court granted appellant’s motion to stay the underlying
proceedings at the trial court level in trial cause number 2012-CI-16420. On March 4, 2014, this
court granted appellant’s motion to abate this appeal because one of the issues presented in the
appeal was the same issue pending in petitions for review filed in Williamsburg Care Co. L.P. v.
Acosta, 406 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), Fredericksburg Care Co. L.P.
v. Lira, 407 S.W.3d 810 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), and Fredericksburg Care Co.
L.P. v. Perez, 406 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed). Our order stated that, 04-13-00823-CV
for administrative purposes, this appeal would be treated as a closed case, unless and until appellant
filed a motion requesting its reinstatement following the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of the
issue. On March 6, 2015, the Texas Supreme Court decided the issues raised in Acosta, Lira, and
Perez. On July 1, 2015, the parties filed an “Agreed, Joint Motion to Reinstate, to Lift Stay, and
to Dismiss Appeal.”
The motion is GRANTED, this court’s stay of proceedings in trial cause number 2012-CI-
16420 is lifted, this appeal is reinstated on the docket of this court, and this appeal is dismissed.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Williamsburg Care Co., LP D/B/A Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamsburg-care-co-lp-dba-princeton-place-rehabilitation-and-texapp-2015.