Williamsburg Care Co., LP D/B/A Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 15, 2015
Docket04-13-00823-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Williamsburg Care Co., LP D/B/A Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta (Williamsburg Care Co., LP D/B/A Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williamsburg Care Co., LP D/B/A Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00823-CV

WILLIAMSBURG CARE CO., LP d/b/a Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare, Appellant

v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta, Deceased; et Jesus ACOSTA, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta, Deceased; et al., Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-CI-16420 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 15, 2015

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

On November 25, 2013, this court granted appellant’s motion to stay the underlying

proceedings at the trial court level in trial cause number 2012-CI-16420. On March 4, 2014, this

court granted appellant’s motion to abate this appeal because one of the issues presented in the

appeal was the same issue pending in petitions for review filed in Williamsburg Care Co. L.P. v.

Acosta, 406 S.W.3d 711 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), Fredericksburg Care Co. L.P.

v. Lira, 407 S.W.3d 810 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed), and Fredericksburg Care Co.

L.P. v. Perez, 406 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013, pet. filed). Our order stated that, 04-13-00823-CV

for administrative purposes, this appeal would be treated as a closed case, unless and until appellant

filed a motion requesting its reinstatement following the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of the

issue. On March 6, 2015, the Texas Supreme Court decided the issues raised in Acosta, Lira, and

Perez. On July 1, 2015, the parties filed an “Agreed, Joint Motion to Reinstate, to Lift Stay, and

to Dismiss Appeal.”

The motion is GRANTED, this court’s stay of proceedings in trial cause number 2012-CI-

16420 is lifted, this appeal is reinstated on the docket of this court, and this appeal is dismissed.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fredericksburg Care Co. v. Perez
406 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Williamsburg Care Co. v. Acosta
406 S.W.3d 711 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)
Fredericksburg Care Co. v. Lira
407 S.W.3d 810 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Williamsburg Care Co., LP D/B/A Princeton Place Rehabilitation and Healthcare v. Jesus Acosta, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Maria Acosta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williamsburg-care-co-lp-dba-princeton-place-rehabilitation-and-texapp-2015.