WILLIAMS, WONDER v. GRAHAM, HAROLD
This text of WILLIAMS, WONDER v. GRAHAM, HAROLD (WILLIAMS, WONDER v. GRAHAM, HAROLD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1068 TP 13-01627 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF WONDER WILLIAMS, PETITIONER,
V ORDER
HAROLD GRAHAM, SUPERINTENDENT, AUBURN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT.
WONDER WILLIAMS, PETITIONER PRO SE.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PETER H. SCHIFF OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County [Mark H. Fandrich, A.J.], entered September 4, 2013) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot (see Matter of Free v Coombe, 234 AD2d 996).
Entered: November 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WILLIAMS, WONDER v. GRAHAM, HAROLD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-wonder-v-graham-harold-nyappdiv-2014.