Williams v. Wright

Supreme Court

Williams v. Wright

180 L. Ed. 2d 882, 131 S. Ct. 3084, 564 U.S. 1033, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4823, 79 U.S.L.W. 3728

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 27, 2011·No. No. 10-10158·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S. Ct. 397, 121 L. Ed. 2d 305 (1992) (per curiam).

Williams v. Wright, 180 L. Ed. 2d 882, 131 S. Ct. 3084, 564 U.S. 1033, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 4823, 79 U.S.L.W. 3728 (U.S. 2011).

Pincite

180 L. Ed. 2d 882 (Williams v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related