Williams v. Williams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Williams v. Williams

72 Pa. Super. 75, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 253

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 17, 1919·No. Appeal, No. 52·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The master appointed in this case discharged his duties with exceptional care and fidelity. His recommendation is fully warranted by the clearly established facts in the case, which after being fully considered by the court were approved and a decree of divorce entered, the only assignment of error being the making of the decree. We have carefully examined all the testimony in this case and concur in the conclusion reached by the master and the court below.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The master appointed in this case discharged his duties with exceptional care and fidelity. His recommendation is fully warranted by the clearly established facts in the case, which after being fully considered by the court were approved and a decree of divorce entered, the only assignment of error being the making of the decree. We have carefully examined all the testimony in this case and concur in the conclusion reached by the master and the court below.

The decree is affirmed.

Williams v. Williams, 72 Pa. Super. 75, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 253 (Pa. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

72 Pa. Super. 75 (Williams v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related