Williams v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Williams v. Williams

55 A. 835, 206 Pa. 644, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 778

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 11, 1903

DocketAppeal, No. 203

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A. 835 (Williams v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Williams, 55 A. 835, 206 Pa. 644, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 778 (Pa. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant sued as a creditor for money loaned; the defense was that he was a partner. It was not disputed by appellant that he had paid in the money, in pursuance of an agreement for the purchase of an interest in the business, but he claimed that the interest had not in fact been given to him and that he had thereupon rescinded the agreement. This was the whole issue in the case and on it the jury found for defendant. We see no error in the mode of submission and there is nothing else in the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Appellant sued as a creditor for money loaned; the defense was that he was a partner. It was not disputed by appellant that he had paid in the money, in pursuance of an agreement for the purchase of an interest in the business, but he claimed that the interest had not in fact been given to him and that he had thereupon rescinded the agreement. This was the whole issue in the case and on it the jury found for defendant. We see no error in the mode of submission and there is nothing else in the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A. 835, 206 Pa. 644, 1903 Pa. LEXIS 778, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-williams-pa-1903.