Williams v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Williams v. Williams

105 A.D.2d 1160, 482 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21291

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 7, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 105 A.D.2d 1160 (Williams v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Williams v. Williams, 105 A.D.2d 1160, 482 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant husband appeals from so much of an order at Special Term as temporarily determined child support and maintenance, pending divorce proceedings. In affirming, we note that courts have repeatedly held that the remedy for any claimed inequity in awards of temporary alimony, child support or maintenance is a speedy trial where the respective finances of the parties can be ascertained and a permanent award based on the evidence may be made (Cloutier v Cloutier, 94 AD2d 974; Woram v Gilliam, 78 AD2d 796; Sterlace v Sterlace, 63 AD2d 450; Vesper v Vesper, 46 AD2d 729). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Scudder, J. — modify temporary support order.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant husband appeals from so much of an order at Special Term as temporarily determined child support and maintenance, pending divorce proceedings. In affirming, we note that courts have repeatedly held that the remedy for any claimed inequity in awards of temporary alimony, child support or maintenance is a speedy trial where the respective finances of the parties can be ascertained and a permanent award based on the evidence may be made (Cloutier v Cloutier, 94 AD2d 974; Woram v Gilliam, 78 AD2d 796; Sterlace v Sterlace, 63 AD2d 450; Vesper v Vesper, 46 AD2d 729). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Scudder, J. — modify temporary support order.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 1160, 482 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-williams-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack