Williams v. Williams

105 A.D.2d 1160, 482 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21291
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 7, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant husband appeals from so much of an order at Special Term as temporarily determined child support and maintenance, pending divorce proceedings. In affirming, we note that courts have repeatedly held that the remedy for any claimed inequity in awards of temporary alimony, child support or maintenance is a speedy trial where the respective finances of the parties can be ascertained and a permanent award based on the evidence may be made (Cloutier v Cloutier, 94 AD2d 974; Woram v Gilliam, 78 AD2d 796; Sterlace v Sterlace, 63 AD2d 450; Vesper v Vesper, 46 AD2d 729). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Scudder, J. — modify temporary support order.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Williams, 105 A.D.2d 1160, 482 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

105 A.D.2d 1160 (Williams v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cullen v. Cullen
166 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Armitage v. Armitage
115 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)