Williams v. Williams

230 S.E.2d 428, 31 N.C. App. 747, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2103
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Williams v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 N.C. App. 163
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 1976·No. No. 7610DC517·Published

Opinion

ARNOLD, Judge.

The record on appeal does not contain the pleadings on which the case was tried as required by Rule 9(b) (1) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Incorporated by reference and attached as an exhibit was the record on appeal of a prior, and premature, appeal in this action. This procedure does not satisfy the requirement of Rule 9(b)(1), and the appeal is subject to dismissal. Johnson v. Hooks, 27 N.C. App. 584, 219 S.E. 2d 664 (1975).

[748]*748However, we have considered .the merits of the assignments of error brought forward and argued in appellant’s brief. We discern no error and affirm the order of the trial court.

Affirmed.

Judges Morris and Clark concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Williams, 230 S.E.2d 428, 31 N.C. App. 747, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2103 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976).

230 S.E.2d 428 (Williams v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Hooks
219 S.E.2d 664 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1975)