Williams v. Williams
This text of 347 S.W.3d 173 (Williams v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Wesley Williams (hereinafter, “Husband”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his motion to modify his maintenance obligation to Ruby N. Williams. Husband’s sole point on appeal claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to terminate his maintenance obligation because he demonstrated a continuing and substantial change in his financial circumstances such that he is no longer able to pay his maintenance obligation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the transcript, and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion, only for the use of the parties, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
347 S.W.3d 173, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1132, 2011 WL 3807551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-williams-moctapp-2011.