Williams v. Williams

732 So. 2d 1243, 98 La.App. 4 Cir. 2899, 1999 La. App. LEXIS 1846, 1999 WL 332783
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 28, 1999
DocketNo. 98-CA-2899
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 732 So. 2d 1243 (Williams v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Williams v. Williams, 732 So. 2d 1243, 98 La.App. 4 Cir. 2899, 1999 La. App. LEXIS 1846, 1999 WL 332783 (La. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

JjBAGNERIS, Judge.

Shirley J. Williams, appeals a trial court’s ruling in which she was assessed court costs. On appeal she contends that the trial court erred in assessing court cost against her. We agree.

FACTS

Shirley J. Williams filed a petition for divorce in which she included a request for permission to proceed in forma paupers. The requisite in forma pauper’s application was completed with supporting financial documentation. Subsequently, by order of court, she was granted indigent status. On September 4, 1998, the court awarded judgment in favor of Shirley J. Williams granting her a divorce, and assessed court costs against her in the amount of $163.50.

DISCUSSION

LSA-C.C.P. Art. 5186 provides in part: ...If judgment is rendered in favor of the indigent party, the party against whom the judgment is rendered shall be condemned to pay all costs due...

In the instant case, the record is devoid of any evidence that Mrs. Williams’ right to proceed in forma paupers was ever traversed or rescinded. Therefore, we conclude the trial court erred in assessing court costs against Mrs. Williams.

^Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the judgment assessing court costs against Mrs. Williams and render judgment against Therman G. Williams, assessing him of court costs in the amount of $163.50.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yarls v. Yarls
30 So. 3d 1101 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
Snowton v. Snowton
22 So. 3d 1111 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
Ulyanov v. Ulyanov
23 So. 3d 380 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 So. 2d 1243, 98 La.App. 4 Cir. 2899, 1999 La. App. LEXIS 1846, 1999 WL 332783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-williams-lactapp-1999.